Archive
SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2026 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2025 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2024 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2023 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2022 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2021 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2020 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2019 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2018 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2017 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2016 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2015 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2014 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2013 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2012 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2011 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2010 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2009 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2008 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2007

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.36719/2663-4619/114/290-293

Bakhtiyar Nasirov

Baku Engineering University

Master student

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0163-6447

bnesirov1@std.beu.edu.az

 

Design of Reinforced Concrete Elements According to AzDTN,

Eurocode and ACI 318 Building Construction Standards

 

Abstract

 

This study presents a comparative analysis of reinforced concrete design standards—Eurocode 2 (EC2), ACI 318, and Azerbaijan's AzDTN 2.3-1—focusing on slabs, beams, columns, and foundations. Using MATLAB-based calculations, the key differences in safety, material strength, and load-bearing capacity are evaluated. The results indicate that ACI 318 allows for higher structural strength (up to 85% more than AzDTN), while Eurocode provides intermediate values. The analysis demonstrates how different safety philosophies influence design outcomes, providing insights for engineers working with multiple codes. The study emphasizes the necessity of aligning international construction practices, particularly in seismic regions.

Keywords: reinforced concrete, design standards, Eurocode 2, ACI 318, AzDTN, comparative analysis, structural safety

 


Views: 710